davemc759 wrote:
JivePoo wrote:
mkZoon wrote:
I think there is a big gap between not having an equalizer and a device being useless...
SO true. it is ridiculous to say that a device is useless without an equalizer. it is equally ridiculous to say that the reason you want an equalizer is because you love high quality sound. if you want high quality sound get some better headphones, without an equalizer it sounds like the artist mixed it to sound.
Guy, this may be true for you but not all of us have perfect ears. Over the years I have lost some sensativity to certain frequencies due to the noisy environments I work in (and yes I wear protection when possible). Without the ability to boost these specific frequencies the music just plain sound wrong.As we are talking about a device whose primary purpose is to provide an enjoyable audio experience the lack of the ability to make the audio sound correct essentially renders the device useless. So, no I tend to agree with the premise of this petition.
I'm sorry for the situation you're in, and i apologize if i sounded unsympathetic to people in your same position. However, i still think it is ridiculous to call the device useless just because it doesn't have an equalizer. Perhaps "useless to me" would have been more appropriate? Personally, I find the device to be terribly useful and definitely the best music player i have ever owned.
I (apparently) have small ears, as every ear bud headphones i have ever tried start to hurt after a bit of listening. Now, to me, this is a huge annoyance as i have to either deal with it (which i do) or go buy better headphones (which i can't afford). For me to call the entire device "useless" would indeed be "ridiculous" as i said before.
Just because the Zune team didn't taylor the Zune to each person individually, doesn't mean it's useless. Sure it means it could be better, but please don't call it useless.